Anderson & Boback Logo

What Rights Do Grandparents Have Seeking Custody?

Published
Categorized as Grandparents Rights

Grandparents often inquire about custody and tell  me that their son or daughter is incapable of parenting their child. Since they consider their offspring unfit, grandparents seek to obtain custody of their grandchildren.  Or, if their own is not involved, and they do not approve of the other biological parent, grandparents, believing they are the better party in raising the child, seek custody of their grandchild.

Even if the grandchild has lived with them for years, there is still a process called standing, that grandparents must overcome.  Grandparents need “standing” in order to seek custody.

By way of illustration, read the case of Roman and Ellen. They raised their grandson Elliot  for two years, when the mother appeared one day and removed the boy from the grandparent’s care.

On February 4, 2011, the grandparents filed a petition seeking custody of Elliot under section 601 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (Act) (750 ILCS 5/601.  The trial court said the grandparents had to demonstrate that they had physical custody of Elliott because the biological mother, Molly,  had voluntarily and indefinitely relinquished custody.  Without that specific finding, Roman and Ellen would not have “standing”, and their custody petition would not be heard by the court.

At trial, the court heard that Molly was seventeen years old when her son was born. She did not have enough money to take care of him and asked Roman and Ellen to provide a home for him.  Molly worked on getting her GED degree and saw her son sixteen times over the next two years.  Her life seemed to stabilize and she moved in with a boyfriend and started having Elliot spend the night at her home.

After one of her visits though, Molly decided that Elliot was not going back to Roman and Ellen’s home.  For three months following Molly’s decision, the grandparents visited Elliot hoping that Molly would change her mind. When she did not, the grandparents filed for custody.

The trial court determined that the grandparents’ conduct during that three-month period demonstrated their acquiescence in Molly’s reasserting physical custody, not merely physical possession, of Elliott. While previously Ellen had directed when Molly would be permitted to see Elliott, after Molly’s retrieval, the grandparents sought Molly’s permission to see Elliott and abided by her decisions. They recognized that Elliott had a home with Molly and returned him there after each visit as directed by Molly. Indeed, Ellen testified that, by the end of the week of November 13, 2010, she realized that Molly would not be returning Elliott to live with grandparents. The Grandparents did nothing to assert any claim to custody until they filed their petition three months after Molly retrieved Elliott. On this record, the grandparents failed to establish that Elliott was “not in the physical custody of one of his parents” (750 ILCS 5/601(b)(2) (West 2010)) on February 4, 2011, when they filed their petition. Accordingly, grandparents lacked standing under section 601(b)(2), and Elliot remained living with his mother.

Timing is very important in these cases. If you have a child living in your care, and no court order exists protecting your rights, please call us.

Was this information helpful?

You May Also Like

A cohabitation agreement is an agreement or contract entered into between two people living together in the same household who are in a romantic relationship but not married. With more millennial couples choosing to live together, whether planning to marry…

When going through a divorce it's not uncommon to think "I never want to get married again!" But later, you may fall in love again and be ready to venture into marriage again. If you are planning to remarry, you…

While doing an initial consultation with an individual looking to get divorced, I have found it is common to get questions about whether it is possible for a divorcing couple to work together with an attorney to do a collaborative…

No one likes to pay spousal maintenance (formally called "alimony" or referred to as spousal support). When you are employed and your ex refuses to work, there is a greater reluctance to want to pay maintenance. In Chicago divorces, there…

Finding the best child custody lawyer in Chicago may seem like a daunting and intimidating process if you have never been involved in a legal dispute. This is especially true when it comes to a custody case involving your children…

Parenting disputes, and accusations of being a bad or unfit parent, are extremely common in the world of divorce, juvenile, and family law. Many parents enter the courtroom with a laundry list of accusations of poor parenting against the other…

RECENT POST
Categories
Archives
Anderson & Boback small logo

Download our Divorce Planning Guide today!

Get the information you need to prepare for divorce with our free resource Guide to Planning for Your Divorce.

What our clients are saying

Why Choose
ANDERSON & BOBACK?

Schedule a Discreet Consultation Today!

    Firm Overview
    ANDERSON & BOBACK?

    Anderson & Boback is a highly-respected, experienced Chicago family law firm, skilled in negotiation and litigation. When divorce and other family law issues make your life chaotic and uncertain, you want your case resolved as quickly and fairly as possible. Call Now 312-715-0870