Can my Attorneys Fees be paid by the other party if there isn’t an Order that has been violated?

Usually, if you have another party that has violated a Court Order, the other party can seek what are known as 508b fees from them. The decision to grant those fees are always within the sound discretion of the court (with the exception of a contempt finding).
However, what if there was no order? What if the other party needlessly increases the cost of your case? Can you ask the court to have the other party pay some or all of your attorneys fees?
In re Marriage of Haken, 394 Ill.App.3d 155 (2009), says yes…..
In Haken, the trial court, relying on In re Marriage of Mouschovias, 359 Ill.App.3d 348, 294 Ill.Dec. 897, 831 N.E.2d 1222 (2005), ordered Petitioner to pay 40% of Respondent’s total attorney fees of $79,090.50 for needlessly increasing the cost of litigation, pursuant to 750 ILCS 503(d), 508(a), and 508(b), after he, over Respondent’s objection, hired two doctors to perform custody evaluations for their case. In re Marriage of Haken, 394 Ill.App.3d 155, 157 (2009)
The appellate court upheld the trial court’s decision, finding that the hiring of the experts and their conduct was “highly unusual,” “highly adversarial,” and ultimately unnecessary in light of the fact that the Petitioner did not even use their testimony to advance his case. Id. at 163.
Similarly, in Mouschovias, the appellate court upheld the trial court’s decision to award the petitioner $40,000 in attorney’s fees for the respondent’s unreasonable continuance of their disputes after the trial court was forced to conduct 15 hearings on temporary custody and visitation issues; 18 hearings on permanent custody and visitation; and 20 hearings on remaining ancillary issues. In re Marriage of Mouschovias, 359 Ill.App.3d 348, 352, 353, 358 (Ill. App. 4th Dist. 2005)

The appellate court countered Respondent’s argument that the trial court did not have the power to order him to pay the $40,000 fee in its entirety, citing 750 ILCS 5/508(b), “[i]f at any time a court finds that a hearing under this [s]ection was precipitated or conducted for any improper purpose, the court shall allocate fees and costs of all parties for the hearing to the party or counsel found to have acted improperly. 750 ILCS 5/508(b) (West 2002).

  • Download our Divorce Planning Guide today!
  • Download our Divorce Planning Guide today!

    Get the information you need to prepare for divorce with our free resource Guide to Planning for Your Divorce.

    click to download now!

What Our clients are saying

Excellent - I highly recommend Kimberly Anderson. She is knowledgeable, assertive, and experienced. What impressed me most about Kim is her dedication. I was able to reach her whenever there was a problem. She always responded immediately, proposed a solution, and put me at ease. The entire legal team at Anderson & Boback is superb.

Lisa March 29, 2018

  • Why Choose Anderson & Boback ?

  • ASLA Badge - Kimberly Anderson 2018
    BBB A+ Badge
    lawyers of distinction badge
    AVVO 10 Rating badge - generic
    Super Lawyers Generic badge

Schedule a Discreet Consultation Today!



  • firm overview Anderson & Boback

  • Anderson & Boback is a highly-respected, experienced Chicago family law firm, skilled in negotiation and litigation. When divorce and other family law issues make your life chaotic and uncertain, you want your case resolved as quickly and fairly as possible. Call Now 312-715-0870